高清福利片

Analysis_

Rethinking capitalism in an age of radical change

18 October 2022
How do we confront our own failures in the climate crisis? In this reflective piece, Arts student Simone Maddison draws parallels between the neoliberal agenda and environmental destruction, and considers alternative roadmaps to move beyond the Anthropocene.

By Simone Maddison, Undergraduate Student, Department of History and Department of Government and International Relations

"Man lives on nature 鈥 nature is his body, with which he must remain in continuous interchange if he is not to die."

- Karl Marx, Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 (1932), p. 31

"Part of what it means to love someone else is precisely to be committed to protecting them from violence and suffering. In this finality of violent death you have to face your failure."

- Danielle Celermajer, Summertime: Reflections on a Vanishing Future (2021), p. 86

Together, the above words communicate failure: to feel the natural world鈥檚 destruction as one鈥檚 own; to change in the face of an existential threat we have created; and to realise that these are failures at all. Following recent findings that of global heating have already been surpassed, the connection between ecological collapse and capitalistic exploitation has never been more striking. Our feelings of collective responsibility, tempered by individual grief and overwhelming helplessness, necessitate a shift beyond the solutions offered by Extinction Rebellion (XR) and the School Strikes 4 Climate movement (SS4C). Reflected most urgently by the , this system of what Professor Danielle Celermajer calls 鈥渙mnicide鈥 instead demands the radical panaceas of eco-Marxism and Multispecies Justice (MSJ).1 Yet despite their similarities, it is only through the latter that may not be reversed, but at least channelled, towards more-than-human solidarity.2

Cracks in contemporary climate action

While understanding the anthropocentric causes of climate change is important, the Romantic narratives of decline, or total salvation, of a once-beautiful natural world in contemporary activist discourses are often counterproductive.3听The paradox within and its subsequent lack of meaningful impact, represents the tension between accountability and inertia stifling environmental justice.4听To be sure, XR鈥檚 flexibility from hosting a to stayed true to its rejection of 鈥榮ilver-bullet鈥 climate solutions.5听But XR鈥檚 ethos to move 鈥渂eyond politics鈥 signifies an exception to, rather than a transformation of, the status quo.6听The issue, then, is not that XR evades a simple climate solution; it is XR鈥檚 ignorance to the systems of governance, trade and sociability which climate change with capitalism鈥檚 obsessions with over-production, profit and mass pollution.

Filling the gaps: overlaps between eco-Marxism and MSJ

This junction between delusion and doom is ripe for intervention by the similarities between eco-Marxism and MSJ. Both approaches begin with relationality between the human and nonhuman worlds.7听Drawing on historical materialism, Marx saw natural systems functioning in a metabolic exchange of energy with human society.8听When disrupted by industry, however, a metabolic rift replaces 鈥渦nity鈥 with 鈥渟truggle鈥.9听This is a matter of sustainability in MSJ, forcing visual, embodied, ethical and political reckonings with the 鈥渇ace鈥 of the Unknown Other.10听As well as establishing a responsibility to lives beyond the self, both theories confront the ethics of situational connections alienating socialised man 鈥渦nder collective control鈥 and neglecting the whole experience of being.11听Therefore, capitalism remains听exploitative as long as it is predicated on power inequality, either in a bourgeois hegemony or the exclusionary anthropocentric identity politics.12

While understanding the anthropocentric causes of climate change is important, the Romantic narratives of decline, or total salvation, of a once-beautiful natural world in contemporary activist discourses are often counterproductive.

By overhauling the assumptions legitimising environmental crisis under capitalism, these tenets present eco-Marxism as a workable framework for MSJ鈥檚 mission of 鈥渓iveability, survivability and justice鈥.13听It was not a failure of liberal democracy which caused the Black Summer Fires, but rather that violence is capitalism鈥檚 desired outcome. Cool, slow and controlled fires have long played an integral role in the health of Australian bushland.14听But the metabolic rift created by the made it impossible to bequeath soil in 鈥渁n improved state to succeeding generations鈥 as Marx intended.15听Likewise, the NSW Berejiklian government鈥檚 alienated workers and activists from collaborative prevention programs.16听The transcorporeal toxicity of Australia鈥檚 smoke is perhaps the most pungent reminder of the need for MSJ.17听The embodied experience of breathing in and choking on dead bodies facilitates an intimate encounter with the Other, dismissing a priori distinctions between polluters and the climate itself.18听This cycle will never feel 鈥榥ormal鈥 because it is a condition of killing.

Climate change vs. systematic revolution vs. epistemological transformation

Yet despite its value, eco-Marxism diverges significantly from MSJ in its ontological and epistemological approaches to nonhuman lives. construction of a heterogenous yet common identity can easily be read as an eco-Marxist movement, reinserting the future working class into the metabolism of 鈥減lace-thought鈥 rather than 鈥渘ature as commodity鈥.19听As young people resisting older elites, corporate control and hegemonic institutions, Australian activists like 听have contributed to a more grassroots vision of democracy. Yet however noble and valuable as a restoration of working-class politics in climate justice, the structural changes advocated for by eco-Marxism are only radical insofar as they encourage divestment and reforestation.

While capitalism is a means to an end for eco-Marxists, MSJ takes it as a starting point to dissect divides in capitalist systems which exceptionalise and universalise human experiences.20听The metabolic rift is only relevant to the extent that it robs the worker, and the worker is only alienated by wealth or Malthusian population crises.21Taking the category of 鈥榤an鈥 as more important than all other species also leads to the false conclusion that he has suddenly landed in this dystopic Anthropocene, denying him responsibility and falsely painting ecological disaster as a tragedy.22If communism makes the division of labour obsolete, it does not abolish society鈥檚 productive and recreational activities; animal oppression is accepted and expected.23听Environmentalism, then, is as much about returning land to the worker as it is about relinquishing hegemony altogether.

No change will occur as quickly as the climate will 鈥 but the alternative is a death of our own making.

Evaluating our extinction

These critiques return us to the merits of MSJ in addressing the crux of climate justice: that failure is not inevitable. But this claim is not without qualifications for MSJ鈥檚 future. MSJ may at first appear to advocate for a consideration of the individual characteristics of a threatened being, rather than its species, to combat anthropocentrism.24听While this exposes the 鈥渨rongness of killing鈥, it ultimately reinforces what MSJ theorists call the fictitious idea that humans are 鈥渋solated, unattached and unencumbered鈥.25听An ethos of care 鈥渂eyond鈥 a human centre alone cannot stop the processes of harm necessary for life, nor should it overpower Indigenous and subaltern praxes.26 Celermajer鈥檚 struggle of 鈥渢rying to do ecological prevention鈥 instead forces a reckoning with the risk of retaining hierarchies in new systems, and not completing this transformation in time.27

When the torrential rains drain and the smoky ash settle, we humans are left with a reality of fear, both of and for ourselves. Given the immutable connection between global warming and capitalism, the intersections between eco-Marxism and MSJ appear as the antidote to a structural transformation of neoliberal political economy and a revolution in diverse ways of being. But while the former is rooted in poisonous anthropocentrism, MSJ provides a more useful roadmap for justice across the powerful inlets of speciesism, racism, sexism, and classism. No change will occur as quickly as the climate will 鈥 but the alternative is a death of our own making.

This article is part of the SEI Student Series on Climate Futures.

1. Danielle Celermajer, 鈥淲ho Killed Summertime? How Do We Trace the Complex Roots of Responsibility?,鈥 The Guardian, February 7, 2021, sec. Environment, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/feb/07/who-killed-summertime-how-do-we-trace-the-complex-roots-of-responsibility, para. 8; Danielle Celermajer, Summertime: Reflections on a Vanishing Future (Sydney: Penguin, 2021).

2. Petra Tschakert et al., 鈥淢ultispecies Justice: Climate鈥恓ust Futures with, for and Beyond Humans,鈥 Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 12, no. 2 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.699; Blanche Verlie, 鈥淐limate Justice in More-Than-Human Worlds,鈥 Environmental Politics 31, no. 2 (2022): 297鈥319, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1981081.

3. Ursula K. Heise, Imagining Extinction: The Cultural Meanings of Endangered Species (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016), 9.

4. Neil Gunningham, 鈥淎rticle 1: Can Climate Activism Deliver Transformative Change? Extinction Rebellion, Business and People Power,鈥 in From Student Strikes to the Extinction Rebellion: New Protest Movements Shaping Our Future, ed. Benjamin J. Richardson (Cheltenham: Elgar Publishing Limited, 2020), 10鈥31.

5. Diana Stuart, 鈥淩adical Hope: Truth, Virtue, and Hope for What Is Left in Extinction Rebellion,鈥 Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Ethics 33, no. 3鈥6 (2020): 493-494, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-020-09835-y; Gunningham, 鈥淎rticle 1.鈥

6. Oscar Berglund and Daniel Schmidt, Extinction Rebellion and Climate Change Activism: Breaking the Law to Change the World (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020), 70.

7. Christine J. Winter, 鈥淚ntroduction: What鈥檚 the Value of Multispecies Justice?,鈥 Environmental Politics 31, no. 2 (2022): 251鈥57, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2039001.

8. Brett Clark and John Bellamy Foster, 鈥溾楳arx鈥檚 Ecology in the 21st Century,鈥欌 World Review of Political Economy 1, no. 1 (2010): 142鈥56.

9. Clark and Foster, "Marx's Ecology", 148; Karl Marx, A Critique of the German Ideology, trans. Tim Delaney and Bob Schwartz (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1932), 110.

10. Petra Tschakert, 鈥淢ore-than-Human Solidarity and Multispecies Justice in the Climate Crisis,鈥 Environmental Politics 31, no. 2 (2022): 281-291, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1853448.

11.听The Illusion of Boundaries and the Gift of Multispecies Justice, Video (Sydney: Sydney Environment Institute, 2022), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLHp6QJca_8&ab_channel=SydneyEnvironmentInstitute; Karl Marx, Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, trans. Martin Milligan and Dirk J. Struik (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1932), 29.

12. Paul Burkett, Marxism and Ecological Economics: Toward a Red and Green Political Economy (Boston: Brill Leiden, 2006), 211; Tschakert, "More-than-Human", 277-296.

13. Tschakert et al., 鈥淢ultispecies Justice鈥, 7.

14. Jens Korff, 鈥淐ool Burns: Key to Aboriginal Fire Management,鈥 Website, Creative Spirits, 2022, https://www.creativespirits.info/aboriginalculture/land/aboriginal-fire-management.

15. Karl Marx, Capital Volume 3 (New York: Vintage, 1981) cited in John Bellamy Foster, 鈥淭he Crisis of the Earth: Marx鈥檚 Theory of Ecological Sustainability as a Nature-Imposed Necessity for Human Production,鈥 Organisation & Environment 10, no. 3 (1997): 288, https://doi.org/10.1177/0921810697103003.

16. Catarina Da Silva, 鈥淔uelled by Coal: Piercing the Mirage of a Sustainable Capitalist Australia,鈥 Marxist Left Review, 2020, https://marxistleftreview.org/articles/fuelled-by-coal-piercing-the-mirage-of-a-sustainable-capitalist-australia/, para. 4.

17. Verlie, 鈥淐limate Justice鈥, 297鈥319.

18. Verlie, "Climate Justice", 299-300; Winter, 鈥淚ntroduction鈥.

19. Sophie von Redecker and Christian Herzig, 鈥淭he Peasant Way of a More Than Radical Democracy: The Case of La Via Campesina,鈥 Journal of Business Ethics 164, no. 4 (2020): 664, 658, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04402-6.

20. Tschakert et al., 鈥淢ultispecies Justice鈥; Danielle Celermajer et al., 鈥淢ultispecies Justice: Theories, Challenges, and a Research Agenda for Environmental Politics,鈥 Environmental Politics 30, no. 1鈥2 (2021): 119鈥40, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1827608.

21. Foster, 鈥淭he Crisis of the Earth鈥; Marco Maurizi, Beyond Nature: Animal Liberation, Marxism and Critical Theory, Historical Materialism Book Series (Leiden: Brill, 2021), 90.

22. Tschakert et al., 鈥淢ultispecies Justice鈥; Celermajer et al., 鈥淢ultispecies Justice"; Celermajer, Summertime.

23. Maurizi, Beyond Nature, 102.

24. Peter Singer, 鈥淚ntroduction,鈥 in In Defense of Animals: The Second Wave, ed. Peter Singer (Oxford: Wiley, 2013), 1鈥13.

25. Singer, "Introduction", 6; Celermajer et al., 鈥淢ultispecies Justice鈥, 120.

26. Celermajer et al., 鈥淢ultispecies Justice鈥, 494-495; Maria Puig de la Bellacasa, Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More than Human Worlds (Minnesota: University of Minneapolis, 2017), 1-2.

27. Danielle Celermajer, The Prevention of Torture: An Ecological Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), 6.


Simone Maddison is a second-year undergraduate student in the Department of History and Department of Government and International Relations at the University of Sydney. Her research interests include interrogating and constructing new ways to embody feminist, intersectional and postcolonial justice in social, political and environmental discourses in student life.

Header image: Dawn in the Jungfrau Region by Christian Cueni via Unsplash.

Related articles