Peer review must remain at heart of research assessment system
Former Education Minister Simon Birmingham鈥檚 overturning of recommendations for government funding by the Australian Research Council (ARC) 鈥� following a peer review process 鈥� is deeply concerning, the has stated.
Last financial year, when Minister for Education, Senator Birmingham vetoed $4.2 million in ARC funding recommendations for 11 projects in the arts and humanities, including one from the University of Sydney.
It is the first time in a decade a minister has used these powers, revealed during a Senate Estimations Committee meeting on Thursday.
鈥淔unding recommendations by the ARC are based on a peer review process, designed to ensure academic integrity,鈥� Dr Spence said.
鈥淭his action by Senator Birmingham must be considered political interference in this process; it is revealing only humanities projects were impacted.
鈥淚t is demoralising for academic staff who work hard to prepare their applications, sometimes for months or years 鈥� on the understanding they will be assessed by experts in their field through the rigorous process overseen by the ARC.
鈥淧erhaps even more important is the message it sends to the world about the state of Australian research.
鈥淎ustralia performs exceptionally well on the global higher education stage, with a large number of universities regularly ranged among the top 200 in the world.
鈥淥ur colleagues overseas will no doubt now be wary of collaborating with us on research grant applications to the ARC when it is clear decisions can be subject to the whim of our politicians.鈥�
The University of Sydney Discovery Project 鈥楶ost-Orientalist Arts of the Strait of Gibraltar鈥�, led by Professor Roger Benjamin from the Department of Art History, had been recommended to receive $222,936 in grant funding.
鈥淚 share my disappointment with Professor Benjamin about this unacceptable outcome, and the message it sends about the state of Australian research.鈥�
Sign up聽to receive University of Sydney news straight to your inbox.