Professor Nick Enfield's co-authored study proving 'huh' is a universal word has won an Ig Nobel Prize and been published by PLOS ONE.
Putting 'Huh' on the map. Video: Dr Mark Dingemanse.
Professor Nick Enfield of the University of Sydney has won an Ig Nobel Prize for breakthrough research in linguistics that found evidence of a universal trait in human conversation.
The are organised by the magazine Annals of Improbable Research and are awarded annually at Harvard University in honour of research achievements that 鈥渕ake people laugh, and then think鈥.
The prizes were first established as a tongue-in-cheek alternative to the Nobels. But the awards, now in their 25th year, have gained their own prestige within the scientific community, with each individual 鈥業g鈥 presented to winners by a Nobel Laureate.
and his co-authors Dr Mark Dingemanse and Dr Francisco Torreira of the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics in the Netherlands were recognised for their 2013 PLOS ONE paper .
In a major cross-linguistic study, they sampled 31 languages and found all have a word with a near-identical sound and function as 鈥楬uh鈥 in the English language; evidence, they proposed, that 鈥楬uh鈥 is an indispensable tool in human communication.
鈥淲e are delighted that our research has been recognised with an Ig Nobel Prize, because it lives up to the awards鈥 mission to celebrate research that first makes people laugh and then think. It鈥檚 fitting because misunderstandings themselves can so often do this,鈥 said Professor Enfield, Chair of the University of Sydney鈥檚 .
Professor Nick Enfield has led a five-year European Research Council (ERC) project into human communication.
Professor Enfield and Dr Dingemanse have followed up their Ig Nobel-winning research with the publication of a new PLOS ONE paper, which suggests聽聽鈥撀爎egardless of the language being spoken.
鈥淭he findings give insight into what is special about language in our species,鈥 said Professor Enfield.
Building on their 2013 鈥楬uh鈥 study, an international team of linguists scoured over 48 hours of conversation in 12 different languages spoken across five continents and found in each language the speakers share the same basic system for 鈥榝ixing鈥 misunderstanding.
Efforts to fix misunderstanding in conversation can be as simple as the word 鈥楬uh鈥 or a question such as 鈥榃ho?鈥 And on average, no five minutes of conversation go by in any language without someone attempting to fix a misunderstanding.
The researchers studied the Aboriginal language of Murrinh-Patha in Northern Australia, Mandarin Chinese in Taiwan, Argentine Sign Language, and Siwu in Ghana, among others. The findings suggest that the universal foundations of language are in human social cognition.
鈥淲e humans excel at monitoring each others鈥 states of understanding, and we are masters of the kind of cooperation and collaboration that mutual understanding requires,鈥 said Professor Enfield.
Language scientists have historically laboured over the study of conversation, but the research of Professor Enfield and his colleagues provide further evidence for a long sought-after finding: a universal principle in how humans communicate in conversation.
鈥淥ur findings could help computers to communicate in more 鈥榟uman鈥 ways, for instance when they don鈥檛 understand voice commands. They also have applications in language teaching and cross-cultural communication: knowing how and when to use these tools can help people to secure mutual understanding quickly and effectively," said lead author of the PLOS ONE paper, Dr Dingemanse.聽
The research is part of a five-year European Research Council (ERC) project led by Professor Enfield.