高清福利片

Unit outline_

PRFM2601: Being There: Theories of Performance

Semester 1, 2020 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

What if all the world really is a stage? In this unit, you will learn key theories and conceptual tools for analysing the broad spectrum of performance events that lie beyond what is conventionally associated with the term 'theatre'. You will conduct original research, focusing on how performance (re)constitutes identity and (re)forms a culture.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Theatre and Performance Studies
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
12 credit points at 1000 level in Theatre and Performance Studies
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
PRFM2001
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Amanda Card, amanda.card@sydney.edu.au
Lecturer(s) Amanda Card, amanda.card@sydney.edu.au
Tutor(s) Jodie McNeilly, jodie.mcneilly@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Research essay
Essay
50% Formal exam period
Due date: 15 Jun 2020 at 23:59
2500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO3 LO4 LO5
Assignment Short response to set reading: Bourdieu
Short Answer
15% Week 07
Due date: 06 Apr 2020 at 23:59
600 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Assignment Short response to set reading: Turner
Short Answer
15% Week 09
Due date: 27 Apr 2020 at 23:59
600 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3
Assignment Research proposal
Essay template
20% Week 11
Due date: 11 May 2020 at 23:59
800 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO5

Assessment summary

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a High distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a Distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Distinction

75 - 84

Credit

65 - 74

Pass

50 - 64

Fail

0 - 49

When you don鈥檛 meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the .

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the .

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a听simple extension.鈥 The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can鈥檛 complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for听special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students,听听includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Performance analysis and everyday life Lecture (1 hr)  
Week 02 Performance of self in everyday life #1 Lecture (1 hr)  
Performance as special event: John Lowell Lewis Workshop (2 hr)  
Week 03 Performance in everyday life #2 Lecture (1 hr)  
Observation Workshop Workshop (2 hr)  
Week 04 Body Capital: Louic Waquant & the Chicago Pugilists Lecture (1 hr)  
Writing Workshop Workshop (2 hr)  
Week 05 Bourdieu's Theory of Practice 1 Lecture (1 hr)  
Bourdieu: key term(s) Workshop (2 hr)  
Week 06 Bourdieu's Theory of Practice 2 Lecture (1 hr)  
Bourdieu: key term(s) Workshop (2 hr)  
Week 07 Rituals as performance Lecture (1 hr)  
Writing workshop Workshop (2 hr)  
Week 08 Liminal or liminoid/ritual or ritual-like Lecture (1 hr)  
Turner: key term(s) Workshop (2 hr)  
Week 09 Performance and identity Lecture (1 hr)  
Writing workshop Workshop (2 hr)  
Week 10 Performativity in performance Lecture (1 hr)  
Butler: key term(s) Workshop (2 hr)  
Week 11 Research Proposals Workshop (3 hr)  
Week 12 Your research proposal Workshop (3 hr)  
Week 13 Research Proposal to Essay Workshop (3 hr)  

Attendance and class requirements

  • Attendance: According to Faculty Board Resolutions, students in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences are expected to attend 90% of their classes. If you attend less than 50% of classes, regardless of the reasons, you may be referred to the Examiner鈥檚 Board. The Examiner鈥檚 Board will decide whether you should pass or fail the unit of study if your attendance falls below this threshold.
  • Lecture recording: Most lectures (in recording-equipped venues) will be recorded and may be made available to students on the LMS. However, you should not rely on lecture recording to substitute your classroom learning experience.
  • Workshops are not recorded
  • Preparation: Students should commit to spend approximately three hours听preparation time (reading, studying, homework, essays, etc.) for every hour of scheduled instruction.

高清福利片 commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Week 2

Required: Richards, Alison. 2001. 鈥楽haking the Frame: Erving Goffman and Performance Studies鈥. Australasian Drama Studies, no. 39. La Trobe University at Bundorra: 58-75,186.

Recommended: Lewis, John Lowell. 2013. 鈥楾he Anthropology of Cultural Performance鈥. In The Anthropology of Cultural Performance, pp. 1鈥20, New York鈥: Palgrave Macmillan.

Week 3

Required: Goffman, Erving. 1990. 鈥楶erformances: Belief in the Part One Is Playing鈥. In The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Nachdr, pp.17鈥51. New York, NY: Doubleday.

Week 4

Required: Wacquant, Lo茂c J.D. 1995. 鈥楶ugs at Work: Bodily Capital and Bodily Labour among Professional Boxers鈥. Body & Society 1 (1). SAGE Publications: pp. 65鈥93. doi:10.1177/1357034X95001001005.

Week 5

Required: (video) Hage, Ghassan. 2016a. 鈥楰ey Thinkers: Ghassan Hage on Pierre Bourdieu Part 1鈥. Youtube/The Monthly Slow TV. Youtube/The Monthly Slow TV. May 2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vn9daX6Jt4g.

Required: (video) Hage, Ghassan. 2016b. 鈥楰ey Thinkers: Ghassan Hage on Pierre Bourdieu Part 2鈥. Youtube/The Monthly Slow TV. Youtube/The Monthly Slow TV. May 2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfBiw9F_oUw.

Required: Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. 鈥楽tructures and the Habitus鈥. In Outline for a Theory of Practice, p. 72. Cambridge University.

Week 6

Required: Maton, Karl. 2008. 鈥楳aton, Karl. 2008. 鈥淗abitus鈥濃. In Pierre Bourdieu: Key Concepts, pp. 49鈥65. Acumen.

Recommended: Thompson, Patricia. 2008. 鈥樷淔ield鈥濃. In Pierre Bourdieu: Key Concepts, edited by Michael Grenfell, pp. 65鈥82. Acumen.

Recommended: Moore, Rob. 2008. 鈥樷淐apital鈥濃. In Pierre Bourdieu: Key Concepts, edited by Michael Grenfell, pp. 98鈥113. Acumen.

Week 7

Required: Maxwell, Ian, 2015. 鈥楳y Big Fat Greek Baptism (Pp听 65-76)鈥. In Performance and Temporalisation: Time Happens. Grant, McNeilly and Veerapen (ed.) Basingstoke, U.K: Palgrave Macmillan,Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:10.1057/9781137410276.

Week 8

Required: Turner, Victor W. 1982. 鈥楲iminal to Liminoid, in Play, Flow, Ritual: An Essay in Comparative Symbology鈥. In From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play, pp. 20鈥59. New York City鈥: Performing Arts Journal Publications.

Week 9

Required: TBC

Week 10

Required: Butler, Judith. 1999. 鈥楶reface (1999)鈥. In Gender Trouble, 2nd ed., pp. vii鈥搙xvi. Routledge.

Week 11

Recommended: Ness, Sally Ann. 2008. 鈥楤eing a Body in a Cultural Way: Understanding the Cultural in the Embodiment of Dance鈥. In Cultural Bodies: Ethnography and Theory, pp. 123鈥44. MA: Blackwell Publishing.

Secondary Readings for Essay (not exhaustive list, will be added to as semester progresses)

Buckland, Fiona. 2002. Impossible Dance: Club Culture and Queer World-Making. Middletown, Conn: Wesleyan University Press.

Crossley, Nick. 2015. 鈥楳usic Worlds and Body Techniques: On the Embodiment of Musicking鈥. Cultural Sociology 9. Sage: 471鈥92.

Findlay, Rosie. 2017. 鈥樷淭hings to Be Seen鈥: Spectacle and the Performance of Brand in Contemporary Fashion Shows鈥. About Performance, no. 14/15: 105鈥19.

Foster, Susan Leigh. 2003. 鈥楥horeographies of Protest鈥. Theatre Journal 55 (3). Washington, D. C: Johns Hopkins University Press,The Johns Hopkins University Press: 395鈥412. doi:10.1353/tj.2003.0111.

Hockey, John, and Jacquelyn Allen Collinson. 2007. 鈥楪rasping the Phenomenology of Sporting Bodies鈥. International Review for the Sociology of Sport 42. Sage: 115鈥31.

Jaimangal鈥怞ones, Dewi, Annette Pritchard, and Nigel Morgan. 2010. 鈥楪oing the Distance: Locating Journey, Liminality and Rites of Passage in Dance Music Experiences鈥. Leisure Studies 29. Taylor and Francis: 253鈥68.

McAuley, Gay. 2014. 鈥楶erforming Sydney: Inhabiting the Edge鈥. In Performing Cities, edited by Nicolas Whybrow, 141鈥58. Palgrave Macmillan.

Maxwell, Ian. 1998. 鈥楩ootball Is Not Theatre鈥. About Performance 4. University of Sydney: 77鈥84.

Rom谩n, David. 2003. 鈥楾heatre Journals: Dance Liberation鈥. Theatre Journal 55 (3). Washington, D. C: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Simon, Bradford Scott. 1997. 鈥楨ntering the Pit: Slam-Dancing and Modernity鈥. Journal of Popular Culture 31. Wiley: 149鈥76.听

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. understand the contributions of some key thinkers to the development of performance studies
  • LO2. apply methods drawn from the work of these thinkers in order to analyse a variety of performance events
  • LO3. draw on general theories of performance as a conceptual lens for understanding some non-theatrical events in everyday life
  • LO4. demonstrate an embodied understanding of, and response to, key concepts
  • LO5. plan and execute a piece of independent performance research.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one鈥檚 personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Modifications have regularly been made to the delivery of this course in response to student feedback.

Disclaimer

Important: the University of Sydney regularly reviews units of study and reserves the right to change the units of study available annually. To stay up to date on available study options, including unit of study details and availability, refer to the relevant handbook.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an .