¸ßÇ帣ÀûƬ

Unit outline_

LAWS6862: Hate Crime

Semester 2b, 2026 [Block mode] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

Hate crime has emerged as a global problem in the last few decades. Yet the concept itself is controversial. This unit aims to trace the development of the socio-legal concept of hate crime, causal explanations for hate crime and the different ways in which it is regulated. The unit will examine some the major forms of hate crime, including racist, ethno-religious and homophobic violence, with a focus on contemporary debates, such as: is violence against women a form of hate crime; should paedophiles be a protected category; should hate crimes attract higher punishment than other crimes? The unit will critically assess the international geography of hate crime law, making comparisons between Australia, the UK and the US. The unit will seek to provoke debate about how we should define and combat the problem of hate crime. Refer to the Sydney Law School timetable - https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/4533/pages/postgraduate-lecture-timetable

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Law
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

No

Teaching staff

Coordinator Gail Mason, gail.mason@sydney.edu.au
The census date for this unit availability is 2 October 2026
Type Description Weight Due Length Use of AI
Out-of-class quiz Early Feedback Task Early Feedback Task (0%)
EFT
0% Mid-semester break
Due date: 25 Sep 2026 at 23:59
10 questions / 20 mins AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1
Contribution Class Participation (10%)
Class Participation ongoing
10% Ongoing Ongoing AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4
Written work Assignment (30%)
A 2000 word written task
30% Week 04
Due date: 16 Oct 2026 at 23:59

Closing date: 30 Oct 2026
2000 words / 3 weeks AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO4 LO1 LO2 LO5
Written work Critical Research Essay (60%)
A 5000 word research essay
60% Week 09
Due date: 17 Nov 2026 at 23:59

Closing date: 14 Dec 2026
5000 words / 7 weeks AI allowed
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
early feedback task = early feedback task ?

Assessment summary

Early Feedback Task (0%)

This unit includes an Early Feedback Task that is designed to provide students with timely insights into their understanding and engagement with the unit content. The Early Feedback Task in this unit is a multiple choice quiz comprised of 10 questions.ÌýThe task will be available on Canvas on 25ÌýSeptember 2026 until 23:59 on 30 September 2026, Sydney Australia time. It will be tailored to reflect key concepts from the first day of classes. Students will be provided with immediate automated feedback upon completion of the task.Ìý

Ìý

Class Participation (10%)

To encourage reading prior to class and engagement with unit content, students will be assessed on their contribution to discussion in class. This participation will be assessed on: 1) Frequency & Preparedness: regularity of contribution to discussion & demonstration of engagement with required readings or other materials 2) Quality of Contributions: degree to which comments are relevant, constructive and demonstate reflective or critical thinking rather than repetition alone. Students will be asked to complete a Self Assessment Class Participation Form to provide feedback to the lecturer on their preparation for and contribution to class discussion.Ìý

Short Release Assignment (30%)

A written Assignment, 2000 words (exclude references), will be available in Canvas from the first day of classes (Tuesday 22 September 2026 9 am). The assignment will be comprised of one or more compulsory question/s.

The aim of the assignmentÌýis to ensure that students engage with key literature in the field. It will assist students to consolidate their understanding of the literature, make connections across literature and topics in the unit and bring a critical eye to these topics. It requires students to read unit materials and participate in the entire unit rather than limit themselves to topic/s addressed in other assignments.

Release date: Tuesday 22 September 2026 at 9 am (Sydney, Australia time).

Due date: Friday 16 October 2026 by 11.59 pm (Sydney, Australia time).

Ìý

Critical Research Essay (60%)

Students will be required to answer a question/s provided by the lecturer. The question/s will be provided at the beginning of classes (Tuesday 22 SeptemberÌýÌý2026 at 9 am). The critical research essay, 5000 words (exclude references), will require students to undertake independent research and provide critical reflection on the topic.

Students will be assessed on the quality of 1) the independent research 2) the critical reflection 3) written skills of analysis, argumentation and communication.

The assignment encourages students to undertake inter-disciplinary research in a specialised area/s. ThisÌýenables students to develop a depth of knowledge in the selected area/s. The assignment also assesses the skills of critical analysis, theÌýdevelopment of an argument, and communication skills.

Release date: Tuesday 22 September 2026 at 9.00 am (Sydney, Australia time).

Due date: Tuesday 17 November 2026 by 11.59 pm (Sydney, Australia time).

Ìý

Word limit penalty:ÌýA piece of assessment which exceeds the prescribed word limit will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment for every 100 words, or part thereof. The total word count for essay and other written assessments will excludeÌýall footnotes and any bibliography (if required), and excludeÌýacknowledgements of assistance from editors, automated writing tools or generative AI (where use is permitted).

Referencing:ÌýThe Sydney Law School expects you to use the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (4th edition, 2018) for your footnoting style, although you should confirm this with your lecturer. A link to the library website where this is set out comprehensively is available atÌýÌý

Special consideration:ÌýSuccessful grants of Special Consideration may involve alternative tasks, as appropriate.ÌýÌý

Assessment requirements to pass a unit of study:ÌýA student must make a genuine attempt at all assessment tasks set out in this Unit of ¸ßÇ帣ÀûƬ in order to obtain a Pass mark and grade (or above); otherwise an Absent Fail grade will be recorded as the student’s result for this Unit of ¸ßÇ帣ÀûƬ.Ìý As the EFT is an early diagnostic tool, this task is not included in the final grade for the unit.ÌýÌý

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in theÌýÌý(Schedule 1).Ìý

As a general guide, a high distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.Ìý

Result nameÌý

Mark rangeÌý

DescriptionÌý

High distinctionÌý

85 - 100Ìý

• Completely answers the question.Ìý
• Contains striking originality of approach or analysis.Ìý
• Demonstrates exhaustive or innovative research (where independent researchÌý
required).Ìý
• Exceptionally well written, structured and expressed.Ìý
• Is otherwise exceptional in some way.Ìý

DistinctionÌý

75 - 84Ìý

• Completely answers the question.Ìý
• Achieves a critical and evaluative approach to the issues.Ìý
• Content and structure is well organised in support of the argument.Ìý
• Demonstrates extensive research and analysis to support a well-documentedÌý
argument.Ìý
• Generally well expressed and free from errors.Ìý
• Has a clear structure and is well articulated.Ìý

CreditÌý

65 - 74Ìý

• Covers main issues fairly well in answering the question.Ìý
• Contains no significant errorsÌý
• Demonstrates an attempted critical approach to the issues.Ìý
• Demonstrates reasonably sound research and analysis in addressing the key issues.Ìý
• Has a clear structure and reasonably clear expression.Ìý

PassÌý

50 - 64Ìý

• Identifies the key issues, but does not follow through with a reasoned argument.Ìý
• Contains some significant errors.Ìý
• Displays satisfactory engagement with the key issues.Ìý
• Offers descriptive summary of material relevant to the question.Ìý
• Superficial use of material, and may display a tendency to paraphrase.Ìý
• Demonstrates little evidence of in-depth research or analysis.Ìý
• Adequate expression.Ìý
• Overall, demonstrates the minimum level of competence in the assessment andÌý
satisfies the requirements to proceed to higher-level studies in the degree or subjectÌý
area.Ìý

FailÌý

0 - 49Ìý

• Does not answer the question.Ìý
• Contains significant or numerous errors.Ìý
• Few or no identifiable arguments.Ìý
• Content that is inappropriate or irrelevant.Ìý
• Lack of research or analysis.Ìý
• Difficult or impossible to understand through poor grammar, expression orÌý
structure.Ìý
• Overall, does not demonstrate the minimum level of competence in theÌý
assessment.Ìý

For more information seeÌýÌý

For more information see guide to grades.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI)

You can use generative AI tools for open assessments. Restrictions on AI use apply to secure, supervised assessments used to confirm if students have met specific learning outcomes.

Refer to the assessment table above to see if AI is allowed, for assessments in this unit and check Canvas for full instructions on assessment tasks and AI use.

If you use AI, you must always acknowledge it. Misusing AI may lead to a breach of theÌýAcademic Integrity Policy.

Visit theÌýCurrent Students websiteÌýfor more information on AI in assessments, includingÌýdetails on how to acknowledge its use.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

The late submission of a piece of assessment, without an approved extension, will attract a penalty of 10% of the total marks available for the piece of assessment per 24 hours or part thereof, after the due time on the due date. Penalties for late submission will be applied strictly, subject to a 5 minute grace period.

Academic integrity

The University expects students to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

Our websiteÌýprovides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. This includes advice on how to avoid common breaches of academic integrity. Ensure that you have completed theÌýAcademic Honesty Education Module (AHEM)Ìýwhich is mandatory for all commencing coursework students

Penalties for serious breaches can significantly impact your studies and your career after graduation. It is important that you speak with your unit coordinator if you need help with completing assessments.

Visit theÌýCurrent Students websiteÌýfor more information on AI in assessments, includingÌýdetails on how to acknowledge its use.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through aÌýsimple extension.  The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can’t complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible forÌýspecial consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students,ÌýÌýincludes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

Support for students

The Support for Students PolicyÌýreflects the University’s commitment to supporting students in their academic journey and making the University safe for students. It is important that you read and understand this policy so that you are familiar with the range of support services available to you and understand how to engage with them.

The University uses email as its primary source of communication with students who need support under the Support for Students Policy. Make sure you check your University email regularly and respond to any communications received from the University.

Learning resources and detailed information about weekly assessment and learning activities can be accessed via Canvas. It is essential that you visit your unit of study Canvas site to ensure you are up to date with all of your tasks.

If you are having difficulties completing your studies, or are feeling unsure about your progress, we are here to help. You can access the support services offered by the University at any time:

Support and Services (including health and wellbeing services, financial support and learning support)
Course planning and administration
Meet with an Academic Adviser

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 02 1. Introduction: What is Hate Crime; 2. Where Does Hate Crime Come From I? Seminar (4.5 hr) LO1 LO2
Week 03 3. Where does Hate Crime Come From II? 4. Imagining the Other Seminar (4.5 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5
Week 04 5. Regulating the Self 6. Intersectionality Seminar (4 hr) LO2 LO4 LO5
Week 05 7. Vulnerability & Difference 8. Ordinary People or Extremists? Seminar (4 hr) LO1 LO2 LO4 LO5
Week 06 9. Hate Crime Law: International Comparisons I 10. Hate Crime Law: International Comparisons II Seminar (4.5 hr) LO1 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 07 11. Hate Crime Law in NSW 12. Policing Hate Crime Seminar (4.5 hr) LO1 LO3 LO4

Attendance and class requirements

Attendance:ÌýAll students are required to attend 70%Ìýof classesÌýto satisfy the pass requirements for this unit. Failure to meet this requirement will result in an Absent Fail grade being recorded as the student’s result for this unit (see The University of Sydney Law School Resolutions: Coursework Awards cl 11).ÌýÌý

Ìý

¸ßÇ帣ÀûƬ commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

All required readings can be accessed from the Reading List on the unit site on Canvas.Ìý

Readings must be read before class. The importance of reading before the classes cannot be stressed too strongly. Where students are prepared and willing to participate, the four days of discussion and explanation will give them a firm and critical grasp of the field. Discussion questions are set for each session. Students should come to class prepared to discuss these questions. Ìý

Given the intensive nature of the unit, and the importance of active engagement with each other, a range of teaching techniques will be employed: mini-lecture, small group work, discussion questions, problem solving, open discussion, class debate etc. AllÌýteaching will proceed on the assumption that the required reading has been done.

Ìý

Warning: The required reading for this unit contains written and visual material that may be distressing, offensive or insulting. While all care is taken to ensure that such content is presented in a sensitive manner, exposure to this material is essential to understand and critique hate crime. If you have any concerns about this material, please do not hesitate to speak with the lecturer.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. Critically analyse historical, social, political and legal factors shaping the emergence of hate crime as a concept.
  • LO2. Evaluate doctrinal and policy based evidence on the characteristics and prevalence of hate crime in the Australian context.
  • LO3. Critically evaluate legal frameworks governing hate crime, including their interaction with criminal justice institutions, punishment and regulation.
  • LO4. Apply relevant legal research methodologies to investigate and develop a sustained, independent analysis of a contemporary issue in hate crime law or policy.
  • LO5. Communicate coherent, well reasoned criminological and socio legal arguments on hate crime to specialist and non specialist audiences.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all University of Sydney graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one’s personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

No changes since unit was last offered

Educational Integrity in Referencing:ÌýAll submitted work must be fully and accurately substantiated with evidence and citations. It must be complaint with the University Academic Honesty in Coursework Policy 2015. In this unit, students are allowed to reference their work by using either: 1) a recognised academic ‘Harvard’ style of referencing (author family name and date in brackets in the text of the paper, using a page number for direct quotes only, and a Reference List at the end of the paper) – for an example see the American Psychological Association Style Guide; or 2)Ìýthe Australian Guide to Legal Citation (4th edition, 2018) –ÌýaÌýlink to the library website where this is set out comprehensively is available at

Ìý

Ìý

Disclaimer

Important: the University of Sydney regularly reviews units of study and reserves the right to change the units of study available annually. To stay up to date on available study options, including unit of study details and availability, refer to the relevant handbook.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an .